Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Necessary Newsflash on Wade

Post Date = 5,15,2019
there's a lot of unsubstaniated drivel circulating today, concerning the Wade Decision [1973].
//==
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
//==
but let's put all that to rest.  if Abortions were a criminal act, the number of people living in China wouldn't be 1.4 billion, it would be 2.8 billion [that's if they had a 2 child per family "law", which let the 2nd pregnancy go its full 270 days, before they removed the ovaries].  so obviously, rape victims can have abortions, and anyone [yes anyone], in their first 3 months can abort, since it might take that long to arrange something.  but this is NOT a moral issue!  it is one of sensibility.  if 5 lines are drawn, then 5 deadlines have been ignored.  the fact of the matter is greatly simplified when we realize that THE STATE, neither owns a prospective mother, any more, than it owns the children that are born.  and were we to surmise any deep or latent ownership, it can always be traced back to the people and their choices, not any sordid controlling elite's wish for a piece of the action.  we should by need recognize, again however, that when someone has a great deal of money and wealth, they can adopt dozens of kids, have their own society, be with many different wives, all in the same month, and their attorneys can write their lodging up in the books, any way they want.  the extent strictures in other words, are put in place to govern, not to harness.

//==
the facts are less consumable of course.  but they are as follows.  since it is by no means a moral issue, then it is one simply of who pays for the medical attention, and, can the TORT LAWS be over-ridden by an inner plenary ruling.  both questions, although difficult to find, are much simpler to answer.  in the case of who pays, the parents pay.  and if the parents can't pay, there is no abortion.  if the parents still want the abortion, they must find a way to pay.  the payment is not up to the people, nor the citizen, nor the state.  if the state must step in, then it is to pay for the ovaries to be removed, not to pay for whatever lavishness an individual might desire.  and as for a minor to be removed from a guardian's care.  the minor must EITHER, get written adhibited permission from those guardians concerned, OR, become a ward of the state.
//==
also remember.  it's Sharia Law that says any girl not covering her face and legs, deserves to be raped.  so it is also their Sharia Law, that wants the rape victim, to bear the fruit of the "Rapist".  ' '/  `.`  ;,;,  -msi
//==
https://www.babycenter.com/pregnancy-week-by-week
//==
the above link is to a small journal of images for different weeks of development.  the author of this article in no way advocates for the site shown in the link.  but rather.  lists it as a possible place to start whatever inquiry.
//==

No comments:

Post a Comment